Spanish Flu News: Yamagata strain deprecated, will be replaced with spanish flu strain

 As I have been saying for a while now:



 Fauci father of death is preparing to release a new (or old) flu variant called the Spanish Flu that he has done post-mortem gain of function research on how the spanish flu used gram positive bacteria like streptococcus in the lungs (upregulated by mask wearing) in order to kill more effectively 


 We now have a smoking gun.  It appears that usually when a new flu strain is released they replace an old one according to scientists 


 What this means is the disappearance of yamagata is heralding a new strain released.  It will likely be an engineered version of Spanish Flu.  This is the whole point of covid, and especially omicron - get everyone testing positive for coronavirus so you can stealth-introduce the spanish flu and wipe out millions of people.  This is only possible if it is stealth, doctors know they can treat flu with antibiotics but if they think it is just another covid variant they won't.  This is just what fauci plans, and the masks are part of giving the spanish flu gain of deadly function.

As fauci's research shows it is gram positive bacteria that enhance spanish flu so get some adaptogens (natural gram positive killing herbs) like ginseng or gynostemma to immunize yourself.  Also taking activated charcoal capsules works on every virus for treatment and prevention and is also the very best way to detox from the vaccine if you were foolish enough to get it.  When it comes to vaccines remember what they said happens when you play with fire... but still there is time to change and detox and never get another one.

Please learn more here (and contribute!):




Archive links to this article:




The Two Witnesses Revealed: Rand Paul and Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

The second witness of this period of tribulation has been revealed, Robert F. Kennedy Jr.  They say the first shall be last and the last first, and RFK jr and his family has definitely been brought to the lowest place possible with the assassination of JFK and RFK and JFK jr.

RFK jr. is doing an absolute perfect job at fighting this tyranny in the most effective possible way by taking on Fauci and especially the FDA and their fake approval of the vaccine.  Huge development that a federal judge shot down the federal vaccine mandate because the approval was not legal, and RFK no doubt played an instrumental role in this development.

Learn more: (most written before code vid)







As I always say, this is not the end of the world, a beast and antichrist arise as well as two witnesses every time the revelation 12 alignment happens, every few hundred years.


February or March will be the sigma variant or tau variant

In a post a few months ago 


 I predicted the sigma or tau variant would be named but that it would be a diversion and that the actual sickness would be the spanish flu which fauci did gain of function research on. The spanish flu can be prevented and cured with activated charcoal and any other antibiotics (or herbs like adaptogens) against the bacteria fauci named in the spanish flu research namely pneumococcus and streptococcus 


Omricon variant was 11 greek letters after delta and was 11 months after. So since sigma or tau are 3 or 4 letters that variant will likely be named in 3-4 months.

  For more information please see 


Edit 11-28-2021

The way this will work is the omricon variant is extremely mild and highly contagious 


so everyone will test positive for covid while the spanish flu will be raging in the background.  This way the plan is for fauci to cover up the spanish flu pandemic so people don't realize it can be treated with common antibiotics and they think it is just another covid strain.


Rand Paul has solidified his place as one of the two witnesses during this period of tribulation

Of course I always want to make clear that this is not the Great Tribulation at the end of the world, but it is a very certain tribulation that occurs every time the revelation 12 sign happens.  In this case that sign happened sep 23 2017.   The tribulation usually starts within 7 years of that sign which is why I have been predicting the start around 2024.  I believe apophis is hades and will mark the worst part of the tribulation in 2029.

Disclaimer out of the way, I have said before here in 2017 that Rand Paul was a leading contender for one of the Two Witnesses during this tribulation.  Two people we can rule out as witnesses are Donald Trump (not that I ever thought he was a contender, but I'm sure some have) and Alex Jones.  Donald did nothing to stop the Beast plan when he had plenty of opportunity.  In fact with operation warp speed he made it happen faster.  Alex Jones I believe has now thrown Owen Shroyer under the bus as he has Joe Biggs and Millie Weaver in the past.  Alex Jones is a snake and probably an FBI asset.

Rand Paul now with standing up to Fauci and proving him a liar and made it very easy for the general public to connect the dots that Fauci in fact created the pandemic, is no longer a contender for the two witnesses, he is doing the work of a witness.  He is the only one right now and I hope and pray the second shows up soon to help as many people and do as much destruction to the deep state as possible.  The two witnesses have historically been killed around the start to 4 years into the tribulation so there are only 3-7 years left for the two witnesses to make everything clear to the people of the world.


Beware the Tau Variant isn't coronavirus covid it is the spanish flu

for more info see https://www.naturevault.org/wiki/pmwiki.php/NatureVault/Influenza 

Could be Tau, Could be Sigma, but it isn't coronavirus. Fauci "father of death" studied the Spanish flu and bacterial coinfections that made it deadly. 

He crafted a special plan to depopulate the world by leading with a weaponized coronavirus to cause the world to get false vaccines that lower natural immunity against bacteria and strongyloides (this is what spike protein does) and wear masks for years that cause bacterial pneumonia. 

Now since bacterial pneumonia is known as a killer in influenza, when the Spanish flu is re-released it has to be disguised. It will be disguised as the tau (or sigma) variant, just another coronavirus.   Of course almost all will test positive for coronavirus because they have been spreading it for years and it is also just the common cold that everyone carries. 

This way when they spread Spanish influenza they will not issue antibiotics to treat it, they will put you on a ventilator to kill you. In this way they will get maximum death from the virus. 

The covid concentration (quarantine) camps filled with extra vulnerable populations will be bioterror breeding grounds to really seed the Spanish Flu strongly and so it can develop variants and infect strongly and ultimately spread as widely as possible around the world.  Of course the virus will be sprayed in chemtrails as covid currently is.

This instance of a Florida doctor being restrained and put in solitary confinement for trying to help a bacterial pneumonia patient with antibiotics is prophetic https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-08-17-florida-hospital-murder-covid-patient-boost-deaths.html#


We knew the Tyranny was coming, this is just the beginning.

archives: archive.is , archive.org

I hope like me you have been turning off the mainstream news and have, for the past decade now, been fully awake and aware of where the powers that be wanted to lead humanity.  Alternative news and commentary for a decade now has been warning of exactly what is happening now.

Unfortunately the vaccine mandates are just the beginning.  Not only do they want to coerce everyone on the planet, especially rich countries, to forcibly inject every one of their residents with deadly cumulatively sensitizing chemicals....yearly... but there is much much more on the agenda.  This is just the start.

We have long known the next aspect on the agenda aside from medical tyranny was going to be climate tyranny.  A climate catastrophe is on the way.  Once people start becoming resistant to health mandates, climate mandates will come.  One of the possible triggers for climate tyranny, just like a bioengineered virus was the trigger for medical tyranny, will be a piece of Antarctic ice falling into the sea.  Now this won't be a natural occurrence, just like Codevid wasn't a natural occurrence either.  You can find evidence openly of scientists using literal dynamite drilled in deep holes in a line along the Antarctic ice to "study" it.  What they are really doing is creating cracks.  This is just like gain of function viral research to "study" super deadly man-made viruses, when in fact they were creating it.

Some other things that might be instituted later on in this decade could be fake alien invasions.  Special collimated lasers can create lights in the sky and holographic images without you being able to see the beams of light that create them.  Some also refer to this very real technology as "operation bluebeam".  This might be the final trigger for total global technocratic dictatorship.

The concentration camps are starting now.  They will put all "at risk" and "unvaccinated" people in these close quarters camps to breed more virus and cause mass dieoffs, different from NAZI concentration camps only in the methods they use to gas the prisoners.  Human medical experimentation is one of the biggest boons for this type of genocide.  Groups of 50 humans in isolation as the new lab rat cage where novel medical experimentation can happen.

Everything will be restricted.  Right now we are seeing employment restricted only to those that hand their live body to genocidal medical experimentation.  Soon movement will be restricted to only those who abide the climate tyranny orders.  Finally a global permanent martial law will ensue when a threat from "out of this world" becomes realistic enough to make everyone afraid enough to acquiesce.

They will have their 7 years of tribulation to run roughshod over the people of the world.  This officially starts probably around 2024.  2029 probably is when things get really hard (Apophis passes by which is hades to ISON's death from revelation 6:7).  And it should be over around the beginning of the 2030's to those who make it.  Eventually the disease they infect others with will infect themselves.  And then a golden age will dawn, where everyone shares and shares alike and we all work together for the betterment of all.

Governments will loose control and loose power.  UN forces will be dispatched to try to regain control, global government will be imposed.

I tell you this so that you will be ready.


The Vaccine Genocide Agenda

So here is the plan of the elite.

1. Antibody dependent enhancement (ADE) is kept alive with continual vaccines.  When a person is continually getting boosters they are keeping thier antibodies up and then an infection with the virus will cause severe lung injury.   This was all by design and why they are topping up everyones antibodies as the cold and flu season starts this season to produce as much Acute Lung Injury (ALI) as possible.

2. Don't blame the vaccine on the antibody dependent enhancement (ADE), blame the unvaccinated.  So you trap everyone into a perpetual treadmill of getting boosters which cause ADE, but instead of blaming ADE we will blame the unvaccinated for keeping COVID alive and breeding new variants, when in fact it is the ADE from the vaccine causing the severe disease in those that keep obeying the government.

3. Make people literally want to murder the unvaccinated for ruining their lives.  They now are trapped into getting boosters which cause ADE until all the unvaccinated are quarantined from normal society.  So they will vote to send them all to quarantine camps.  This is just the next iteration of Concentration Camps where there will be medical experimentation and forced labor and rampant disease.


* Treatments that include Regeneron (REGEN-COV casirivimab and imdevimab) are anti-spike protien antibodies that will invoke antibody dependent enhancement as well.

* Taking immunosuppresent steroids for controlling lung injury in Antibody dependent enhancement cases will cause likely strongyloides hyperinfection.

* It appears that ADE can begin as early as being infected with the virus only 2 days after the immunoglobins. So we know that genetically modified people are producing the antibodies well into the future.


The Tuberculosis Conspiracy

Archive https://archive.is/I1IZk , https://web.archive.org/web/20210709220937/https://www.naturehacker.org/2021/07/the-tuberculosis-conspiracy.html

Tuberculosis is a wretched and hidden disease causing almost any symptom you can think of.  At least 1/3 of everyone in the world has it.  If you don't have 'symptoms' it is called "Latent".  However many of the symptoms are so varied that you almost would never know if it was active.  Everything from back pain to insomnia to chronic pain to chronic fatigue to arthritis and more.

Nearly every country besides the US vaccinates their people against Tuberculosis.  It is called the BCG vaccine.  I am not pro-vaccine but this should be noted.  America doesn't give the vaccine because 'Murca ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ ?  

Even when someone in the US tests positive to TB via the skin test, they will just call it a "latent" infection and not treat it.  Dooming the person to a life long of health problems that they will be addicted to drugs to treat.

What the military does is very telling.  Anyone who tests positive via the skin test is put on a full course of antibiotics.  They are all regularly tested so if anyone becomes positive again, they get treated again.  This will ensure that people who were in the military will not have TB.  However many of the vaccines they get will give them other diseases.  But the way the military handles TB is absolutely the correct way.  We should all have the test available and be given antibiotics if desired to treat it.

But that would go against the deep state plan.  The plan to keep everyone sick all their lives and dependent on Big Pharma spending literally thousands of dollars a month to have insurance just for the ability to get dangerous drugs that will never cure the root cause of any disease while their body struggles with the TB Mycobacterium all their lives until it finally kills them.

Hidden TB infection makes people ultra-conservative.  This is what they want to foster in the US.  They want a new Nazi regime in America.  And they are binging in Muslims, Muslims are not allowed to eat garlic or onions, which kill TB.  The culture is designed to foster the TB bacteria and make it systemic.

The FBI and the deep state are trying to Make America Hateful again.  The liberals they are infecting with Toxoplasmosis which is another topic entirely.  But tuberculosis is the one that is the biggest conspiracy against America itself.

Something else to note: I believe based on research that both COVID and the COVID vaccine reactivate latent TB via the coronavirus spike protein.  What this means is everyone with TB becomes more unhealthy when they get infected with the virus or they get the vaccine.  This is the source of "Long haul covid" and also for most vaccine side effects.  It is no wonder that they are trying to push as much vaccine on America as possible, to reactivate TB even stronger and cause more disease and also extremism that they can use to implement new laws and also control a NAZI army.


How the FBI is destroying the United States using Political Immunization

Using their network of "confidential informants" the FBI is demolishing the country.  Here is how it works.  The "official" dark motive for why they orchestrate and stage events like January 6th and Unite the Right rally is to immunize the government from imagined (not real) threats.  They think that if they create a provocative event then likely stage injuries and/or fake deaths, that it can wake up the government and cause it to create antibodies (laws) that will neutralize such threats in the future.  It is a democratic "vaccine" agenda.

But there is an even more sinister dark motive.  This is to segregate and polarize the population.  They want not only the government to respond to the imaginary threats that the deep state wants, but also the population.  If you can get people to belong to groups that you (the FBI) define, then you can easily manipulate them.  This is really neatly embodied by fake martyrs.  For the right you have Ashli Babbitt who may or may not be a real casualty or could have used a blood packet and is now living under a fake name.  Same in the case of the lefts martyr George Floyd.  Deaths are faked all the time and for various agenda's but for the FBI it seems to be to polarize the population and immunize the government against threats to its unconstitutional power.

The FBI itself is unconstitutional, as is the Police State that we currently live under.  The only constitutional enforcers are Sheriff's, and we have seen that they are much less likely to carry out violence against the public, especially if they weren't trained using the unconstitutional military and unconstitutional police forces.  Anyway, the most important step in cleaning house is to understand the problem.  The FBI and all three letter government organizations need to be immediately disbanded.


I was right; super grasshoppers have arrived to the US

Almost exactly 1 year ago I predicted that the African dust would bring grasshopper eggs to the US that would interbreed with our grasshoppers creating Africanized grasshoppers that can cause swarming and mass destruction just like the Rocky Mountain Locust. https://www.naturehacker.org/2020/07/its-possible-that-african-dust-can.html

Well it has happened: https://www.sgtreport.com/2021/07/giant-swarms-of-grasshoppers-that-can-be-seen-on-radar-are-devouring-crops-all-over-the-western-u-s/


Arizona Audit Maricopa County False Flag Coming




I have been doing lots of research on the election and I think I have arrived at a pretty good picture of how Dominion specifically rigged the vote in collusion with campaign managers and election officials as laid out here:


I also clearly remember that when Pizzagate researchers got close to implicating Media Matters insider James Alefantis, a false flag was launched.

So for the scientific process we will use our theory of media matters false flag generation to make a prediction.  They will run a false flag blaming "the big steal" conspiracy theorists for a mass shooting or attempted shooting after the arizona audit results are unveiled.  That is how science works, you give credence to your theory by making a prediction.  And I am sure this prediction will come true to galvanize the brainwashed against doing research into voter fraud like the Comet pizza false flag was launched to galvanize people against the reality of Comet ping pong relation to child trafficking.


Elon Musk's Invescapades


So here is what happened.  Elon musk sells 50 Billion dollars worth of Tesla stock ending on 9:45 AM on the morning of Thursday 1/28/2021.  

Elon Musk then buys covered shorts of Gamestop at 9:45 AM and tweets that shorting stocks should be illegal.  

Elon Musk then tweets a "Dogue" picture and then buys 5 Billion dollars worth of Dogecoin.  

Then Elon musk changes his twitter profile to "#Bitcoin" and buys 50 Billion dollars worth of Bitcoin.

Quite a day, sending the entire world into a confused dizzy.  But it was really all just one dude.

Expect Tesla to start adding Dogecoin and Bitcoin to thier balance sheet and they will facilitate payments via crypto for thier Tesla taxi service and sending crypto payments between Tesla owners.  Tech companies will use cryptocurrency as a "Reserve Currency" similar to how gold used to back the dollar.


Bitcoin vs Digital Collectible Currency (DCC) in overcoming technical challenges

Archive: Wayback, Archive.is

Here I will list the problems laid out in the Bitcoin white paper with digital currencies, how bitcoin (a decentralized digital currency DDC) solved them, and how a Digital Collectible Currency (DCC) can also solve them.  We will also discuss which format has better solutions to which problems.

Verification of ownership of a coin 


Digital signatures are used with public/private key encryption


Digital signatures are used with public/private key encryption

Creation and distribution of coins


Bitcoin solves the creation and distribution of coins by having a challenge every 10 minutes where one lucky miner will win and get awarded a set number of coins.  Basically a lottery where the price of a ticket is energy usage.  

Basically in Bitcoin, you buy an ASIC and work on a hash problem that there is no way to figure out the right answer, you have to try every possible solution.  The lucky one who finds the right solution first, wins.


A DCC solves the creation and distribution of coins by letting miners create and complete a challenge on their own or in a group that meets the requirements of the coin.

You create your own challenge, and don't need any connection to the network to both create the challenge and complete it.

In our DCC, you generate a large random number that is the right bit length, and then you factor it using a CPU/GPU combo.  The prime factorization is the solution and earns you a coin.

Pro's and Con's 

In bitcoin the miner has to be constantly connected to the internet and has to compete within time limits.  In a DCC the miner never has to connect to the internet and can mine at their own pace.  

Everyone can earn coins simultaneously in a DCC whereas only one person can earn coins every 10 minutes in bitcoin.  

Also in bitcoin ASIC's are the most powerful miners which price out normal people from earning coins by mining.  In a DCC consumer grade APU's (CPU GPU combo like a laptop, desktop, or smartphone) will be the most efficient miner until quantum computers can compete in several decades for GNFS factorization. 

Bitcoin may be more resistant to quantum computers because it uses an NP-complete algorithm whereas our version of a DCC uses an NP-hard algorithm.  However DCC is much more resistant to acceleration in GPU's, FPGA's, and ASIC's.  Also a DCC can be designed that uses NP-complete algorithm if desired.  In any case quantum computers are decades off that would be able to complete the factorizations that everyday computers can complete today.

DCC has a very serious advantage in the creation and distribution of coins.

Sending coins


In bitcoin, coins are assigned to your public key to which only you know the private key to claim them.  You then sign a transaction that verifies that you give a coin to another person's public key.  Once this transaction becomes a part of the blockchain, you can no longer spend it, and the person you gave it to can spend it at will.


In a DCC coins are assigned to a public key that only you know the private key for just like bitcoin.  But to spend the coin, you must give the private key to another person off-chain.  So using encrypted messaging, bluetooth, snail mail, passing a note, or verbally, etc.  Now both you and the recipient know the private key.  The recipient then needs to send a message to the network in order to change the private key so they are the only ones that can spend it in the future.

Pro's and Con's

In bitcoin everything is on-chain, so you do not need to open up a side communication channel to send coins.  In a DCC you need to comunicate with the other party directly likely via either encrypted communication like email or wallet to wallet or physically with bluetooth.  Bitcoin has a distinct advantage here, but it is also nice that in a DCC you can send coins without internet connection.  With bitcoin you can receive coins without an internet connection, which you cannot do with a DCC (unless you trust the person to not double spend it, or you get it via bluetooth from a phone app that somehow prevents double spending).

In bitcoin you need to wait up to 1 hour for your transaction to be confirmed in the network.  In a DCC when someone changes the private key to receive coins, they can immediately ping the network and see if it was verified and integrated.  DCC has the potential for much faster transactions than bitcoin, however bitcoin's transactions would likely be more secure on average.

Bitcoin has the lead here for ease of sending coins if you have an internet connection but are not in-person.

DCC has the lead here for speed of transactions.

The DCC has the lead here for in-person point of sale, the merchant would need to be connected to the internet but the buyer would not need to be and transactions would be faster than bitcoin and likely cheaper.

Preventing double spend

Double spend is where someone gives their coin to multiple people at once and therefore gets more products than he can afford.


Double spending is prevented by a blockchain; that is an unbroken chain of transactions that cannot be reordered or changed without re-completing the proof-of-work faster than the rest of the honest network.


Double spending is prevented by allowing the receiver of the coin to change the private key of the coin they are given.  The receiver pings nodes in the network to confirm that the private key of the coin was changed to their private key, and no one else's.

Pro's and Con's

Bitcoin requires less coordination between nodes to prevent double spend.  A new miner can simply see what the longest blockchain is, and accept that as objectively the true and correct chain.

DCC requires coordination between nodes.  You will have to look for a consensus of nodes to know what the true ledger is.  Likely some nodes will be more trusted than others so you will value their ledger as more correct.  Bad nodes can be blacklisted from the network and their staked coins erased.  Also nodes could require a subscription or connection fee to download or collaborate with or send a transaction to their ledger.  This will likely even out with bitcoin, since there are no transactions on the DCC ledger, you will not have to pay transaction fees in a DCC.

Bitcoin has a more cohesive and authoritative and rigid way to prevent double spend.  But in practice and network code optimization, DCC should become quite close and be more flexible if errors are later found, unlike bitcoin.



Bitcoin incentivizes nodes by requiring nodes to be constantly connected to the network and have an up-to-date ledger to mine for the currency, collect transaction fees, and to send it.


DCC incentivizes nodes by requiring a connected node to securely receive payments.  Node runners might also require a fee to connect to them and declare that you received a payment.

Pro's and Con's

Bitcoin using mining to incentivize running network nodes has an advantage here, but in practice, I expect roughly equal numbers of nodes in either setup.



In bitcoin the mining reward is very highly divisible.  However it needs to be because there are so few mining rewards.  There is an ultimate indivisible amount called the Satoshi which is a set and small fraction of a bitcoin.


In a DCC, each mining challenge awards the miner with the smallest unit possible of the currency which cannot be further subdivided.  This is similar to the satoshi in bitcoin.  In our DCC this doesn't matter as much since there is no limit to how many people can be solving challenges at once.  The difficulty of the problem can be set, and adjusted, so that the coin maintains a relatively constant value if desired.

Pro's and Con's 

While bitcoin is clearly more divisible than DCC in theory, in practice DCC could be difficulty adjusted to make each reward worth a small amount similar to a satoshi or a penny (or more preferably a dollar).

Price stability


Bitcoin's price is not designed to be stable.  Bitcoin is designed to have an ever increasing value by having ever diminishing supply.  Also there are liquidity crises every block halving which occurs roughly every 4 years.


The price can be very stable in a DCC.  A price target can be set and the challenge difficulty adjusted to keep the price fixed on whatever is desired.  If the price rises, the difficulty can be lowered so more supply comes on the market.  If the price falls, difficulty can be raised to reduce supply.  A consensus of nodes would be required to set the numbers minimum bit length to be factored to be awarded a coin.  Adjusting the difficulty can make mined coins less fungible until they are accepted to the network in which case even if later the bit length is no longer adequate, the coin would still be valid.  The varying requirements only effect newly mined coins being accepted onto the network.  So if your factors currently don't meet the requirements, you can sit on it until the difficulty lowers in which case you can submit it to the network.

Pro's and Con's

DCC clearly has an advantage in price stability, but at the cost of potential loss of fungibility of some mined coins that are still in-process when difficulty requirements change.  Difficulty adjustment can be done at set intervals like monthly or yearly to prevent miner frustration.



In bitcoin everything is transparent but pseudonymous, there is no identity linked to a public key.  However if a public key can be linked to an identity like through using off-chain exchanges, your entire history can be tracked if you are using that one public key.  Ways around this is to own many public keys that are not linked to exchanges and only connected to your other public keys through obfuscated routing of transactions through 3rd party intermediates.  Sophisticated tools could likely still use metadata techniques to figure out what your likely public keys are.


In a DCC each coin has a separate public and private key.  Therefore there is no way to link together the keys to which you own without somehow snooping on your off-chain communications.

Pro's and Con's

DCC has much stronger privacy built in.  Mining and sending coins can have 100% unbreakable privacy since it can be done without an internet connection.  Receiving coins requires a node and IP address so thus can potentially be spied on, but much less so than bitcoin.



Bitcoin's biggest vulnerability is a 51% attack.  This can happen when a miner or colluding group of miners achieve 51% of the hash-power of the network.  When this happens a coin can basically be destroyed at will causing a fork in the chain.  Non-colluding miners can be prevented from mining and transactions of non colluding actors can be stopped.  It is basically a hostile takeover.  It can also be done in secret.

There is nothing that can be done to mitigate this risk.


A DCC is vulnerable to a large group of bad colluding nodes that will accept your private key change request, but later reverse it in order to double spend the coin.  This would happen on a transaction by transaction basis and cannot effect the network as a whole unlike the 51% attack on bitcoin.

This can be mitigated by reporting your key change to nodes that are trusted, either by experience or by them having staked coins.  Bad nodes that reverse transactions can be blacklisted from the network and their staked coins erased.  Nodes are disposable, and having a fork in the nodes does not effect the security of the coin unlike bitcoin.

Pro's and Con's

Bitcoin has the lead here for casual everyday transactions being more secure.  There is forced consensus on bitcoin whereas in a DCC the consensus is voluntary.  Node software would likely have to undergo constant research and development to develop protocols that make the network as consensus attaining as possible complete with incentivizing good behavior and punishing bad behavior.

DCC has the lead here for no "Currency destroying" vulnerabilities like the 51% attack.  Many altcoins have died due to 51% attack, and it is only a matter of time to bitcoin also succumbing.


Toppling the Blockchain: A prime factorization, digital collectible based currency

Archives: Wayback, Archive.is

Bitcoin talk and Archive and Another

The blockchain is top heavy.

The chain can restructure and can throw off the previous awards.  This is why many confirmations of a transaction are needed, to limit the possibilities of a chain restructuring throwing a wrench in your transaction.  This slows down transactions.  China could be secretly mining bitcoin off-chain right now as we speak, and a year from now send their blockchain and destroying all transactions in the last year for example.  This system is flawed.

Also in current cryptocurrencies, only one person can win coins every 10 or so minutes, and therefore they need to be easily tradable.  But what if everyone could earn coins on their own relatively quickly, and even allow for mining offline? (offline mining).  In this idea the miner could always be offline, the only person that needs an internet connection is the person a miner is transferring coins to.

No transactions on-chain.

The secret is that we don't need transactions.  We don't have to facilitate the transfer of the value.  All we need is something (a ledger) that keeps track of which public key owns a coin.  In order to trade the crypto, you wouldn't send the coin to another public key, you would just give the person your private key to the coin.  

First you can prove you own a coin by signing a transaction using your private key to verify you own the public key that owns a coin.  Then someone can give you a product, and you can then give them the private key.  See below heading of "Preventing double spend" for how double spending is prevented in this system.

You could send the private key to another person using encrypted communication, Bluetooth, the mail, verbally, etc.  This is fine because you can have one coin per private key if you want, that way if you want to send someone 10 coins, you just send them 10 private keys.  Or you can assign 10 coins to one key if you want.  It doesn't matter.

Prime Factorization

In our case a "coin" is a prime factorization of a certain length number.  For "coins" to be fungible, the length of number shouldn't change throughout the life of the cryptocurrency.  However there could be a roadmap where every year or month or something you have to factor one more digit number.  So the first year for example would be 300 digit numbers, second year would be 301 digit, or something like that.  

For example we can choose 300 digit numbers, and your prime factorization must be of a 300 digit number that is created, in part, by hashing your public key.  If it was just any random 300 digit number, it would be too easy because you wouldn't have to factor the number to create the prime factorization, you could just multiply random prime numbers together until you got a composite number of 300 digits.  By requiring using the public key hash, it forces you to actually factor a number.  We can also require that the number be odd and that there can be no prime factors greater than 1/2 the length, so no factors bigger than 150 digits.  This negates any "easy to factor" numbers.  We can also stipulate the first and last digits cannot be zeroes to also prevent someone from just searching for easy to factor numbers by adjusting their nonce.

The distributed ledger would look something like this:

Public Key:                                 Nonce:                            Prime factors:                      

H45JY4O9LCVW5G                 346573                            3, 3, 3, 5, 5, 11, 17...                    

JW45OLGU792POQ                 648293                            3, 3, 5, 5, 5, 17, 19...                                                    578208                            7, 7, 11, 11, 13, 17...

NW34KIW87MN24                  825401                            5, 5, 17, 19, 19, 23...                       

The prime factorization represents the prime factors of a compound number that is 300 digits long.  By just multiplying together all the prime factors you can verify that it gives a 300 digit long number that is the product of hashing the given public key with the nonce.  This nonce can be anything and can be selected by the miner randomly.  The public key also can be created by the miner as a hash of their private key and would have to fulfill requirements like types of characters used, length, etc. The number to factor (given as the hash of the nonce and public key) can be greater than 300 digits (preferably using Skein 1024), and truncated down to it's first 300 digits.

Notice that the public key "JW4..." owns 2 coins.  This can be done, but is discouraged.  It is best if each key only owns 1 coin so that you cannot link multiple coins to the same person.  However it is valuable for staking as described in the "staking" section below.

Updating the network of nodes

So say someone sends a message to the network that they just factored a 300 digit number.  They send their public key, the nonce, the prime factorization, and a signature that verifies they own the private key to the public key (that last step is optional, some may want to mine for others public keys without knowing the private key, however making sure the miner owns the key might be best to prevent slavery).  

Now, as a node maintaining a ledger, here is what you do to verify.  You hash the public key with the nonce and truncate to get a 300 digit number.  Next you multiply all the prime factors together and verify it equals that 300 digit number.

If everything checks out, you add a line to your database that says this public key owns this prime factorization; basically that the public key owns a coin.

Preventing double spend

Double spend is one of the only viable ways I can think of to attack this network.  However it really isn't hard to overcome it.

When a transaction happens and the miner wants to send the coin they just mined to compensate someone, they send that person the private key to that coin. Now, what is to stop him from sending the private key to multiple people at once?  Or what is to stop them from remembering (copying) the private key so they continue to have access to it?  

Well, we need another step where the receiver can ensure that they are the only one who has the key. When the recipient receives the private key to the public key, she immediately sends a new message to the network, signed with the current private key (that the giver still knows), of changing the public key to a new number.  She would hash the current public key with her newly chosen private key (that the giver does not know), and a nonce if desired; creating a new public key that the previous owner can no longer claim. A "paper trail" would be kept by the network of what the original public key was, and what it was changed to.  The original public key would need to be always kept so the prime factorization could always be verified.

Bad Nodes

Bad nodes are the only other way that I can forsee an attack on the network.  The way it would work is a bad actor would make a bunch of nodes (not trivial to get many public ip addresses).  Next they would send a coin, the reciever would change the public key of the coin using a new private key, the reciever now thinks they own the coin and give the bad node person a product.  But now that the bad node has the product, they could delete the entry that said the public key was changed.  Or they can create a fraudulent transaction to replace the real transaction that changes the public key to something they themselves have a private key for instead.  This is a double spending attack as well.  This attack can also be done in bitcoin.

So to get around this it might be necessary to not only ping a dozen random nodes that the trasaction has been verified before handing over the product.  You would likely do that but also ping some "trusted nodes" that you know have been honest before.  Also the staking thing below could help determine trusted nodes.  If a bad node is found out, they can be labled a "bad node" and be blacklisted (and their staked coins blacklisted and lost).


Another thing that could be done is staking, basically a node can be required to sign for (prove ownership of) several coins to make sure that his node has coins staked to its public key, which might increase good behavior.  If there is bad behavior those coins can be mutually deleted from everyone else's ledger.  In this case it would make sense for all the coins to be under one public key, so if that node ever gets blacklisted, coins from that public key would be deleted from all ledgers.  Staking could be optional, and nodes with more at stake, could be rated more highly by people's software wallets.  The higher rated you are, the more people will trust your ledger.

Why run a node?

In bitcoin, not many people run nodes.  Usually only miners run nodes and that is so they can mine.  Mining is basically what incentivizes people to run nodes.  But another reason in bitcoin to run a node is so that you can add transactions to the network.  You have to be running a node connected to the network to send it transactions.
In our case, you also need to be running a node to send a transaction to the network.  However you do not need to be running a node to either mine nor send a person a coin.  The only person that needs to have a node running is the person receiving the coin, so they can change the private key via sending a message to the network.

Also donations can be another reason.  If a person is a well respected node, then people could potentially donate coins to them.  Also if a bad node tries to "take back" the coins they gave you, you can alert a trusted node of this and they can help you take back your coins by showing their timestamp for your transaction was before the bad nodes fraudulent transaction.  A good node going to bat helping you recover your transaction might tend to get them tips.

More ideas on incentivizing good nodes would be welcome.

Benefit: "instant" transactions

The transactions are not perfectly instant and they also need an internet connection to confirm by the receiving party,  however they are as fast as possible.  There is no waiting arbitrary lengths of time (blocktimes) for confirmation, you simply send the transaction to the network, then ping the network to make sure it verified and implemented your transaction.  You would likely ping a dozen random nodes or some trusted nodes to make sure they got your transaction. Nodes would likely also ping each-other to make sure their ledgers are all in agreement or dispute discrepancies.

Benefit: improves encryption security 

One benefit to this design is this ledger would be a list of however-many-digit compound numbers, which will narrow down the search for primes in this space, and these primes used to create more secure encryption.  If someone does find a 300 digit prime number, that could certainly be used as a type of coin as well, but those are much less asymmetric, meaning that it is easier to check number for primality than to factor them, and also they are much slower to verify they are prime than multiplying together prime factors.  So unfortunately for this coin design, primes would likely not be useful.  However perhaps another coin can be designed that uses prime numbers exclusively and you can send the primes you find to that network instead.

Another extremely valuable benefit to this coin design is in determining safety of various length RSA numbers.  RSA numbers have had a bounty on them to see if anyone can factor them, to track how safe RSA numbers are for encryption.  These bounties offered large sums of money to see how big of a number could be factored with current technology.  Instead of offering bounties, researchers could watch this coin and get a real-time gauge of how safe RSA numbers are for cryptography in the wild for free; an extremely valuable service.





(Note: I was only familiar with bitcoin white paper before formulating this idea, but it finds an almost identical design as b-money, and solves a few of it's questions.  Also the notion of "digital collectible" is similar to how BitGold defined it.)

Cypherpunk history This history states that b-money is vulnerable to Sybil attacks, which it is by making each node get one vote, but it did include the staking of coins to run a node which dis-incentivizes this.  In our protocol, each node is not equal and does not get an equal vote, trustworthy nodes would get more vote than others based on the choice of which nodes the person sending a coin uses to verify their transaction.  Staking in our design is a voluntary and variable and the users of the coin are the ones who vote on which nodes are trustworthy by who's ledger they trust.

I have been following the digital renminbi and think this would be a good decentralized competitor.

Topplcoin, toppl, topplecoin, restcoin, restfulcoin, flatcoin, off-chain, offcoin